Make vs Microsoft Copilot Studio

Make vs Microsoft Copilot Studio: side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, pros and cons. Pick the right AI tool for your task.

Make
Best for: Complex automations, app integrations
Microsoft Copilot Studio
Best for: Enterprise agents, Microsoft ecosystem
OverviewVisual automation platform connecting 1,000+ apps. More flexible than Zapier, cheaper than most alternatives.Build and deploy custom AI agents for your business. Integrates with Office 365 and Teams. Now supports Claude models.
PricingFreemiumFreemium
UsersFree / from $9/moFree / from $200/mo
Advantages
Visual canvas makes complex automations easy to debug
Credit model from Aug 2025 aligns cost with actual usage
Native AI modules for OpenAI, Claude, Anthropic built-in
Unlimited scenarios on paid plans starting at $9/month
Deep integration with Teams, SharePoint, Outlook, Dynamics 365
Multi-model support: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Opus 4.7
Visual no-code agent builder — no developer required
Enterprise-grade security, compliance, and SSO out of the box
Disadvantages
Credit model less predictable than old operations model
Steeper learning curve than Zapier for beginners
Free tier limited to 2 active scenarios only
High-volume scenarios require Teams plan or higher
Copilot Credits complex — $200/25k credits, less value than old model
April 2026 developer backlash over pricing value reduction
Only truly useful inside existing Microsoft 365 ecosystems
High cost for small teams outside enterprise volume discounts
Rating
Websitemake.comcopilotstudio.microsoft.com