Make vs n8n
Make vs n8n: side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, pros and cons. Pick the right AI tool for your task.
Make Best for: Complex automations, app integrations | n8n Best for: Workflow automation, AI pipelines | |
| Overview | Visual automation platform connecting 1,000+ apps. More flexible than Zapier, cheaper than most alternatives. | Open-source workflow automation. Self-host free with unlimited runs, or use cloud. Native Claude and Gemini AI nodes. |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Users | Free / from $9/mo | Free / from $20/mo |
| Advantages | ✅Visual canvas makes complex automations easy to debug ✅Credit model from Aug 2025 aligns cost with actual usage ✅Native AI modules for OpenAI, Claude, Anthropic built-in ✅Unlimited scenarios on paid plans starting at $9/month | ✅Self-hosted Community Edition: free, unlimited workflows and executions ✅April 2026: removed active workflow limits on all cloud plans ✅Native Claude, Gemini, and vector store AI nodes built in ✅Cloud Pro at 60 EUR/mo — cheaper than competitors for heavy use |
| Disadvantages | ❌Credit model less predictable than old operations model ❌Steeper learning curve than Zapier for beginners ❌Free tier limited to 2 active scenarios only ❌High-volume scenarios require Teams plan or higher | ❌Self-hosting requires DevOps knowledge and infrastructure management ❌Steeper learning curve than Make or Zapier for non-technical users ❌UI less polished than commercial alternatives ❌Official support only on paid cloud plans |
| Rating | … | … |
| Website | make.com | n8n.io |